Q&A: Relying on Verbal Authorization

Graphic painting

Q. On March 31, 2020, after calling my HOA, I was given verbal permission to replace my roof, which was leaking. I signed a contract to replace the roof on April 15, 2020. Now the board has sent me a letter with a $500 fine for not getting a permit and doing ‘nonessential’ work during COVID-19. All I have to prove their permission is phone calls on my cell—no texts or voicemail, just a record that calls were made. Is this enough to fight their actions?

                               —But They Said I Could

A. “The owner complains that he was given verbal authorization to replace the roof by his homeowners association (HOA),” says Anne P. Ward, of counsel with Ehrlich, Petriello, Gudin, Plaza & Reed, PC, with offices in Newark and Morristown, “but was surprised to be subsequently fined by the HOA’s board of  directors for: a) failure to obtain a (municipal?) permit and, b) doing non-essential work during the COVID-19 pandemic. The owner does not say who told him it was acceptable to replace his roof. Did this authorization come from the property manager or the management office? Did this authorization come directly from the board? Given the dates referenced, the owner apparently started construction during the pandemic. 

“My answer to the question is twofold: an owner must always refer to his association’s governing documents to learn the parameters of the association’s power, as well as the specifics of his own obligations in every circumstance. And it is always prudent to have any authorizations reduced to writing by the source, along with details describing the limits of the authorization. 

“To begin, an HOA and its property are always subject to state and municipal ordinances. The HOA is not exempt from those obligations simply because it is governed by its own rules and may have discrete regulations governing construction on the premises. Hence, an owner is always responsible for adhering to municipal requirements, and must obtain necessary permits. An HOA is powerless to waive such requirements. Indeed, most associations make it clear to applicants who seek permission to perform construction that state and municipal requirements are a prerequisite to the HOA’s permission.

“Moreover, it would be the rare governing documents which do not specifically advise an owner that ownership is subject to state and municipal laws. Every owner is automatically subject to the governing documents upon purchase of a unit. He is assumed by law to be on notice as to their contents, and has agreed to be bound by virtue of the purchase.   

“Therefore, any authorization (verbal or otherwise) by an association is circumscribed by an owner’s obligation to comply with municipal ordinances. Here, there was apparently a need to obtain a municipal permit prior to construction. In addition, the construction apparently ran afoul of state or municipal restrictions placed on work during the pandemic. A work authorization issued prior to the pandemic is still subject to restrictions adopted during the pandemic under the state’s police power.

“As stated earlier, the HOA is bound by these laws and it must enforce them or place itself at risk. I suggest that the owner communicate with the board or its counsel about all this. He can request a reduction or elimination of the fine based on a misunderstanding of his obligations and the fact that he entered a contract to replace the roof, as a result. However, this argument may not prevail in light of the fact that there is no proof of the authorization and because an owner is deemed to be on notice of applicable law.” 

Related Articles

Management in Crisis:

Management in Crisis:

How the Pandemic Changed an Industry

COVID-Related Legislation Affecting Boards & Managers

COVID-Related Legislation Affecting Boards & Managers

When the Law Meets a Pandemic

Dishwasher flat line icon. Household appliance for washing utensil, dishware. Outline sign for mobile concept and web design, store.

Q&A: Delinquent Dishwasher?

Q&A: Delinquent Dishwasher?

Pining for the Pool

Pining for the Pool

NJ Condo Owners Are Swimming … in COVID Restrictions

Making Moves

Making Moves

COVID-19 Affected 61% of Americans Who Moved This Year

Community Meetings in the Time of COVID

Community Meetings in the Time of COVID

Staying Distant Without Disengaging

 

2 Comments

  • The roof was leaking.. to me it was an emergency to replace the roof. I've experienced lots of contractors who fail to obtain permits for their customers hoping they can bypass the permit process and shave some of the cost for the owner. HVAC, Plumbing, Roofing etc. In the end when the township becomes aware of the work performed the township always gets it's permit money. That's all they want. I don't think it's the HOA's business to be involved in the permitting process to the point of placing a $500 fine., it's between the homeowner and the township.
  • In my opinion... Replacing a roof is done in plain sight and likely requires more than a days time, even if it's a DIY project! The question at hand is where was BOD oversight at the time of the actual roof teardown/replacement? The HOA has a right to stop the repair and verify approval processes. Both owner/BOD appear to have neglected thier responsponsibties - the desparate owner needing to minimize further damage and the BOD for failing to enforce association approval processes at the time of the request and if overlooked - work was obviously being done in plain sight - Did a BOD member turn a blind eye 'wink-wink' and now the city comes knocking? In addition, this incident provided an opportunity for the BOD to send out a (community wide) communication reminding owners to always secure BOD approval/denial in writing and refer to the governing docs to validate their rights and obligations. It appears to me that there was a 50/50 responsibility for lack of communication and/or oversight and perhaps the association's fine should have been reduced as such. As for the HOA getting involved, YES they should - it is one of the BOD's many FIDUCIARY DUTIY and in this case, it partially their failure for NOT redirecting the owner. A wise Association should mandate that every active BOD member attend training as to fully understsnd their exposure and potential personal liabilties, as well as the same for the Association's potential financial burden if governing docs are not adhere to, no exceptions! I assume your 2021 complaint has already been resolved. Let me leave you with this - if you don't want HOA/condo oversight, restrictions and/or fInes, MOVE OUT AND PURCHASE A SINGLE FAMILY HOME! Respectfully, A condo owner.