“By way of background information, in a cooperative form of ownership, legal title to the real and personal property of the development is vested in the cooperative entity, which in New Jersey is traditionally established as a profit, rather than for non-profit corporation. Individuals purchase shares of stock in the cooperative corporation, which carry with it as an incident thereto the right to occupy the dwelling unit, pursuant to the document called a “proprietary lease.”
“Accordingly, the shareholders have a legal interest in the corporation, as an entity and a beneficial interest in the project itself. The corporation, which is managed by a duly elected board of trustees, or directors, manages the project for the benefit of its shareholders.
“As previously indicated, the duties and powers of the board of trustees, is set forth in the association’s governing documents, which include the certificate or articles of incorporation, the association’s bylaws and relevant provisions of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act. The courts in the state of New Jersey have generally upheld decisions of the board, which have been challenged by shareholders, as long as the board has acted and operated within the authority granted by its governing documents. The decisions or rules and regulations promulgated by the board, are generally reviewed by the courts, in accordance with the business judgment rule.
“Accordingly, since the affairs and business of the corporation is the responsibility of the board of trustees, the selection of a management company to carry out its various functions would normally be relegated to the sole discretion of the board. Shareholders, generally have little rights when it comes to the selection process, pertaining to the engagement of a vendor, whether it be a management company or any other service provider engaged by the cooperative corporation.
“With respect to your particular situation, this question should be posed to the board or to the board’s attorney to ascertain their position, as to whether the governing documents grant them the authority to act without shareholder input and/or approval.
“Notwithstanding the same, generally the meetings of the board of directors are opened to the shareholders and it depends, on whether or not your particular board of directors permits shareholders to be present, when the board is taking various action, as it pertains to negotiating of contracts, interviewing potential vendors or other matters involving personnel, which are usually not opened to the public.
“Again, without the benefit of reviewing the association’s governing documents or knowing how your board of directors operates its meetings and how they conduct business, the opinion provided is a general response. Personally, I would think that most boards would prohibit individual shareholders from being involved in the interview process with potential management companies. Again, any action taken by the board, which is challenged by the shareholders, can ultimately be reviewed by a court, in accordance with the provisions set forth above.”