Q&A: Radburn on Term Limits

Q&A: Radburn on Term Limits

Q. Does the Radburn Law make it impossible to have term limits for our board?

—Owners Concerned about Abuse of Power

A. According to Hubert Cutolo, an attorney with the firm of Cutolo Barros in Freehold: “In 2017, the Planned Real Estate Development Full Disclosure Act (‘PREDFDA’), N.J.S.A. 45:22A-43 et seq., was amended to address, among other things, board election procedures in community associations. Pursuant to this amendment, community associations having 50 or more units ‘shall not provide for a term of an executive board member to be for more than 4 years.’ (N.J.S.A. 45:22A-45.2(c)(1).) In other words, the bylaws of a community which contains 50 or more units cannot provide that the term of office for any board seat is longer than 4 years. This provision does not prevent the association from setting term limits. Rather, it sets a statutory limit on the length of time for any single term of office.

 “Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 45:22A-45.2(b) and (c)(4), no community association can prevent the nomination of any member in good standing for the board. While these provisions do not expressly prohibit setting term limits through an amendment to community association governing documents, it is evident that the 2017 PREDFDA amendments were intended to facilitate, rather than limit, member participation in community association governance. It is therefore likely that a court would interpret an amendment to a community association’s bylaws setting limitations on the number of terms that a member in good standing can serve as being in conflict with PREDFDA.”

Related Articles

New Jersey State House on a sunny morning. Built in 1790, the New Jersey State House, located in Trenton, is the capitol building for the U.S. state of New Jersey

Q&A: Feelin’ the Radburn

Q&A: Feelin’ the Radburn

 Video surveillance security cameras graphic icons pictograms set vector

Q&A: Legal Surveillance?

Q&A: Legal Surveillance?

image of dog dark background

Q&A: To Fee or Not to Fee?

Q&A: To Fee or Not to Fee?

Co-op/Condo/HOA  Instructions Included

Co-op/Condo/HOA Instructions Included

The Importance of Governing-Document Literacy

lifeguard sitting on chair with megaphone at poolside for guarding lives

4 Legal Issues to Watch This Summer

Pot, Pools, & More

Row of the new townhouses in Richmond, British Columbia.

Aesthetic Standards

How to Enforce These Important Rules



  • Owner concerned about abuse of power redux on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 6:26 PM
    IMHO my reading of the Radburn Law underlying intentions as to 'participation and inclusion' also sought to rectify the occurrence of any individual or group retaining control of a Board in perpetuity by running for an unbroken chain of terms with no provision for a step-down year. Therefore, the argument of encouraging participation and inclusion is obviated by the more realistic scenario that by your definition, a group retains control by perpetuating an unbroken chain of reelection and control. That seems to me as primarily what the Radburn Law was trying to prevent - disenfranchisement, privileged right to run and vote, entrenched board rigging the process. If you prevent the endless re-election chain, you are then actually creating the veritable opportunity you claim for more shareholders to become involved. This can only occur when you create the opportunity by preventing chain electioneering.