Page 5 - NJ Cooperator Summer 2020
P. 5

NJCOOPERATOR.COM  THE NEW JERSEY COOPERATOR  —  SUMMER 2020    5  QUESTIONS & ANSWERS  Legal  Q  A&  Visit us at ARMANAGEMENTCO.COM  and call us today.  Mount Arlington: 973.398.6609  Morristown: 973.605.2775  facebook.com/armanagementco  linkedin.com/company/armanagementco  Better Community   Living Starts Here  Getting Access to a Contract  Q  I pay HOA fees for landscaping.   Not all areas of the development   are the same—some streets just   have ornamental trees and a minimal amount   of leaves falling. My block is swamped with   leaves on the ground that begin in Septem-  ber, but I cannot get management to send the   landscapers to keep walkways clear. How do   I get copies of the contract between the HOA   and the landscapers? How can I document   or build a case on my own without lawyers?   Are there any laws that I can refer to if I want   to see bids, details of the work provided, or   a schedule of days landscapers should be   working,  and  also  the  work  that  they  did/  should do? I would like to fi nd a way to per-  suade  management  to  provide  more  atten-  tion to certain areas when necessary.                            —Seeking Transparency  A  According to Vanessa Pena,   an attorney with Griffi  n Alex-  ander, headquartered in Ran-  dolph: “A unit owner is entitled to copies of  Profi t Corporations Act N.J.S.A. 15A:5-1 et.   various documents that are held by the asso-  ciation and its managing agent. Among these  be permitted to inspect executed contracts  at the Business Judgment Rule and upheld   documents that unit owners are entitled to  with contractors who are responsible for per-  view are copies of executed agreements be-  tween the association and the contractors it  property. An association’s refusal to permit  hold from inspection any documents that in   has chosen to perform work for the com-  munity. Depending on how an association’s  such refusal to be contrary to the Business  pending or anticipated litigation or contract   governing documents set forth access to  Judgment Rule, which must be followed by  negotiations. Th  is distinction would pre-  these documents, a unit owner can request  the board to assess requests for the review of  clude an association from allowing contracts   to  schedule a  time to  inspect agreements  associated records. Under the Business Judg-  that have been made with contractors, which  ment Rule, a board’s actions are protected as  tions to be withheld from inspection.  should include the type of work to be per-  formed and the timeline and hours by which  bylaws, or the Master Deed; and (2) are not  ever, it is not the unit owner’s individual   the work must be performed. Typically, an  fraudulent, do not constitute self-dealing,  responsibility to go aft er a contractor. Th  e   association would require that this request  and are not unconscionable. (See   be made in writing and allow the association   a certain amount of time (i.e., 10 days) to set   up a time for the unit owner to inspect the  Refusal to allow an association member to  unsatisfi ed with the work that is being per-  documents.  “While there is no specifi c statute stat-  ing that a unit owner is entitled to inspect  seen as unconscionable by a court.  executed contracts between the association   and its chosen contractors, interpretations of  however, the board may have more authority   the New Jersey Condominium Act N.J.S.A.  in limiting what an association member may   46:8B-1  et.  seq.,  and  the  New  Jersey  Non-  seq. suggest that association members should  (App. Div. 2001), the Appellate Court looked   forming work on the association’s common  other things, authorized the board to with-  such access may result in a court deeming  ‘its reasonable business judgment’ involved   long as they are: (1) authorized by statute, the   Committee   for a Better Twin Rivers v. Twin Rivers Home-  owners’ Ass’n.  , 192 N.J. 344, 369 (2007)).  the common property. If the unit owner is   inspect a contract that has already been dis-  cussed, negotiated, and executed could be  alert the association’s management of the is-  “In terms of inspecting contract bids,  board of any concerns.”  access. In   Mulligan v. Panther Valley Property   Owners Ass’n.,   337 N.J. Super. 392, 307-308   an amendment to the bylaws that, among   and/or bids that are still undergoing negotia-  “Notwithstanding this information, how-  association, not the unit owner, contracted   with the landscaper to perform services for   formed, the fi rst step to take would be to   sue and attend board meetings to notify the   continued on page 18 


































































































   3   4   5   6   7