Page 11 - New Jersey Cooperator February 2019
P. 11

NJCOOPERATOR.COM  THE NEW JERSEY COOPERATOR —  FEBRUARY 2019    11  can come up here \[to the offi  ce\] and have   them handled the right way.”    Another major consideration is what   a particular property requires from a   manager. A large multi-story, multifam-  ily building with many amenities is more   management intensive than, say, a small   six-unit line of duplex units with no in-  terior common areas and no amenities.   So what requires the expertise of profes-  sional management. And what does the   manager actually do?  What Gets Managed  Management  services  can  be  divided   into several categories. First of all, there   are continual management items as well   as non-recurring needs. Building em-  ployees, such as doorpersons, handyper-  sons and porters, have to be supervised   daily and require payroll services. While   payroll services can be easily outsourced   with or without a managing agent, actual   on-site supervision requires continuing   management.   Another recurring management item   is purchasing and bookkeeping. Owners   send in monthly payments for mainte-  nance and common charges, and bills   must get paid out of those collected   funds. Th  is recurring item is handled by   the management company’s bookkeepers,   who work hand in hand with other man-  agement company employees to make   sure a property has   everything it needs   to function – from   paper towels to light   bulbs to  cleaning   supplies.  Th  ere are also   non-recurring or oc-  casional items like   various building in-  spections; supervi-  sion of occasional   work or scheduled   projects for improve-  ments; and owner-  ship transfers for   units. Th  e managing agent has the re-  sponsibility of overseeing these things as   well.  Effective Self-Management  All  those  responsibilities  sound like   a  lot of work  –  and  they  are. In  a  large   complex of units where owners share the   management fee at aff ordable levels, it’s   pretty clear that it’s well worth it to have   professional management. But are there   alternatives for smaller properties?  Tina Larsson is   the Co-Founder of   Th  e Folson Group,   a New York City-  based  company  that helps co-op   and condo prop-  erties self-manage   eff ectively. “We set   up policies,” she   says, “the same   way a  managing   agent does. How   do we vet contrac-  tors, for instance?   Managing agents   have requests-for-proposals, or RFPs. We   set up something similar, only easier and   simpler.  We  guide  the  client  on  how  to   use this system. It’s specifi c to the work to   be done. We also direct them to resources   like   Th  e New Jersey Cooperator,    where   they might fi nd what and who they are   looking for.”  And what about the idea that manag-  ing agents who represent multiple prop-  erties have purchasing power that indi-  vidual properties don’t? Larsson says it’s   not true. “Purchasing power – managing   agents say they have it, but if you call a   specifi c vendor, you can ask for the same   discount the managing agents get, and   most of the time you’ll get it too.”  Larsson’s fi rm also off ers its clients   a thorough review of their expenses –   something a managing agent generally   doesn’t do. Th  e fi rm searches for ways   to save money and earns its fee based   on  those  savings.  Larsson  explains  that   whereas a managing agent’s job consists   of  bookkeeping,  compliance,  closings,   complaints, and inspections – a self-man-  agement consulting fi rm fi nds sources for   these services for self-managed prop-  erties and sets up systems to track and   manage them. Records and documents   are kept in the cloud to reduce or even   “Th  ere are two big   benefi ts to self-managing:   the fi rst is that it’s   cheaper, and the second   is the accessibility and   you know the people   personally.”          — Domenick Lorelli  continued on page 21


































































































   9   10   11   12   13