Page 14 - CooperatorNews New Jersey Summer 2021
P. 14

14 COOPERATORNEWS NEW JERSEY 
 —SUMMER 2021 
NJ.COOPERATORNEWS.COM 
Your Association is in Good Hands with 
Homestead Management Services. 
Responsible Property Management that responds to your needs 
•  
Personal, 
responsive customer care with 24/7 
emergency call service 
•  
Modern, 
fully intergrated databased network for  
quick response to problems and solutions 
•  
Live, 
expert staff of experienced 
management personel 
A complete financial package: 
• Complete Monthly Financial  
Statement •Accounts Payable 
• Accounts Receivable •Deliquency  
Report •Annual Reports 
www.homesteadmgmt.org 
Family owned with over 35 years years of experience 
328 Changebridge Rd. Pinebrook, NJ 07058  973-797-1444  
284 Rt. 206 South, Hillsborough, NJ 08844 908-874-6991  
©  AAMC 
ACCREDITED ASSOCIATION 
MANAGEMENT COMPANY 
ATTENTION BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS 
Maintenance of any masonry/concrete mid to high rise building is  
CRUCIAL 
From parking decks, to balconies, to brick pointing, window caulking, 
parapet walls, and roof structures, simple maintenance and inspection is  
IMPERATIVE 
 to keep your investment  
DRY 
 and  
STRUCTURALLY SOUND. 
  Water intrusion can cause: 
• Structural damage 
• Damage claims from tenants and owners 
• Mold issues and lawsuits 
• Safety issues, e.g., falling masonry 
& Restoration Inc, of Jersey City, NJ, successfully completing over $200,000,000 
of restoration work in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. H2O Pro operates 
only in New Jersey and we pledge to you that if you trust us to oversee exterior 
repairs to your buildings we will treat them as if they were our own. 
Choosing the right contractor is extremely important! Who are we? 
Call Toll Free: 844-774-6776 
Small maintenance issues can become large capital projects. We work with  
you or your architect/engineer, to establish a repair plan that keeps your 
investment safe and sound without breaking your budget. 
raising funds to operate their properties, so  
without being able to adjust carrying charg- 
es to meet rising costs, many co-ops will be  
hard pressed to meet their expenses if this  
bill passes. 
Weinstein adds that the bill also per- 
tains to renewal leases and subleases, which  
might have consequences for individual  
condo owners who rent out their units. “You  
can’t recapture individual units, except for  
quote-unquote ‘good cause,’” she adds. “So  
let’s say you lease your unit out. You may not  
be able to take it back.” In short, she says,  
“this bill could severely restrict the board in  
maintaining  its  building,  and  will  prevent  
individual unit owners as well from renting  
their apartments on a short-term basis and  
getting those apartments back. So I think it  
has detrimental potential on multiple levels  
to affect the housing supply and the ways in  
which a co-op or a condominium currently  
operates.” 
Reason for Rejection 
Another swath of legislation getting  
a lot of attention in New York are Senate  
bills 1449, 2846, and 2874, which deal with  
boards disclosing a reason for rejecting a  
co-op or condo purchase applicant, and  
the timing for doing so. Weinstein says that  
these types of bills have reached the legisla- 
ture every couple of years for the last decade  
or so, “and they usually just don’t go any- 
where. … [but] this year, there are three of  
these bills in the Senate that seem to show  
some movement.” 
With the ostensible purpose of providing  
transparency and eliminating the potential  
for  discrimination,  the  bills  would  require  
boards of co-ops to provide a written expla- 
nation for their rejection of a prospective  
buyer, rather than the current leeway boards  
have to reject an applicant “for any reason,  
or for no reason.”  
But Philip Simpson, an attorney with  
Robinson  Brog,  a  firm  also  based  in  New  
York, points out that “New York City pres- 
ently has the broadest scope of protection  
for groups of people against whom co-op  
boards might discriminate. If a prospec- 
tive purchaser in a protected class is turned  
down and sues, the co-op board may well  
have to articulate a reason in response to the  
lawsuit.”  
Aside from that apparent redundancy of  
the bill, boards have the fiduciary responsi- 
bility to protect the assets of their commu- 
nity and the investments of their individual  
shareholders. In fact, attorneys representing  
both  co-op  corporations and  prospective  
shareholders advise that the most common  
reason for denial is the financial position of  
the applicant. Since cooperators in a hous- 
ing corporation share financial responsi- 
bility for the operation and upkeep of the  
property, it is particularly important for  
incoming shareholders to be able to con- 
tribute proportionally now and for the fore- 
seeable future. Similarly, Simpson also says  
that he has “seen denials, or issues raised,  
when the board views the purchase price  
as too low. A low purchase price will affect  
values throughout the building, because  
it will become a comparable sale the next  
time an apartment comes on the market,  
or someone wants to refinance their unit’s  
“This bill could  
severely restrict the  
board in maintaining  
its building.” 
—Margery Weinstein 
LEGAL... 
continued from page 13 
mortgage.”  
One of these bills that Weinstein sees as  
particularly problematic says that if the board  
doesn’t act within a certain period of time,  
the board is deemed to have consented to the   
applicant. She points to the effect this would  
have on financing, questioning whether  
mortgage lenders would accept such tacit  
consent without seeing it in writing. Simi- 
larly for the issuance of a cooperative’s title  
insurance. “Yeah,” says Weinstein, “I think  
both title policies and lenders are going to  
want the affirmative consent. And the board  
might refuse to issue that affirmative con- 
sent. So then where are we?” 
Kill Bill 
Out in Nevada, a number of bills of con- 
cern to community and homeowners as- 
sociations “died” before reaching Governor  
Steve Sisolak’s desk. This is good news for  
unit owners and boards who feared the fi- 
nancial ramifications of the proposed laws,  
suggests Barbara Holland, certified property  
manager and columnist for the  
Las  Vegas  
Review-Journal.  
Among these are Senate  
Bill 144, which would have eliminated non- 
judicial foreclosure, required assessment  
increases to be approved by the state, and  
mandated that every homeowners associa- 
tion have a website that it maintains. Other  
killed bills include Assembly Bill 295, on the  
availability of records; Senate Bill 257, which  
would have eliminated the requirement that  
the association maintain property insurance  
for certain condos/townhomes; and Senate  
Bill 339, which would have allowed an HOA  
to lease abandoned properties. 
Holland attributes the bills’ “deaths” to  
emails and calls from association constitu- 
ents in the state. So keep contacting your  
local, state, and federal legislators to voice  
your support for or opposition to proposed  
legislation that affects you as a co-op share- 
holder, condo unit owner, or association  
homeowner! As laws related to co-ops, con- 
dos, and HOAs continue their way through  
legislatures and judiciaries,  
CooperatorNews 
will continue to keep you informed.              
n 
Darcey Gerstein is Associate  Editor  and  
Staff Writer for CooperatorNews.
   12   13   14   15   16