Page 22 - NJ Cooperator Winter 2020
P. 22

22 THE NEW JERSEY COOPERATOR   —WINTER 2020  NJCOOPERATOR.COM  builds something they’re not allowed  ter—and it can create a terrible environ-  to—like a bench. If no one says anything  ment and often results in a board being   for too long and others do the same, and  removed. If it’s discriminatory, it could   then a new board comes in and tries to  bring a lawsuit—a very serious one.”  enforce the no-benches rule, it becomes   much more difficult. You’ve allowed the  ity be considered in all enforcement by   infraction for too long,” and it becomes a  the board. There cannot be selective en-  fact on the ground.  Limiting Access to Amenities  Another potential disciplinary ac-  tion boards can take against owners and  be made. Boards may consider waving   shareholders  who  flout  the  rules  and  fines for lateness in some cases. Every-  regs is to limit their access to commu-  nity amenities, like a pool or a gym. Both  pay their bills. It is true, though, that a   Brooks and Hakim advise against this.  “Absent express permission in the  advantage of this situation. No blanket   governing documents to do so,” says  immunity  should  be  issued,  but  some   Hakim, “we do not recommend it. We  kindness is expected.”   recommend that each board revise its   governing documents to permit, if not   already included, the imposition of fines  Hakim. “The building staff are the eyes   for a breach, and other remedies such as  and ears, but should generally stay out   removal from the board, if a board mem-  ber.”   Brooks sees barring owners from  example, it would be acceptable for the   common areas or amenities as very det-  rimental to the association. “It’s difficult  that. If the resident refuses to leave, then   to do in Massachusetts to begin with,” he  it should be reported to the board. I pre-  says. “How do you enforce it? It can be-  come  very  ugly.  If  an  owner  is  revoked  in the daily lives of residents not get into   access, he might say he has an undivided  confrontation with anyone.”  interest in the common areas in the deed.   How do you take that away? I don’t like it,  tionally, a unit owner or a board member   but sometimes owners don’t challenge it,  would report a violation to the full board   so it can in some cases be effective.”  Proceed with Caution  While thinking outside the box is usu-  ally a good thing, the pros who contrib-  uted their expertise to this article gener-  ally feel that boards should avoid getting  In all cases, building employees should   ‘creative’ when it comes to rules enforce-  ment. “The board cannot discriminate in  board members should use discretion   its application of the house rules,” says  before commenting themselves. That re-  Hakim. “Eighty percent carpeting gener-  ally means eighty percent carpeting. The  it’s minor, okay, but it should be done in   Business Judgment Rule does permit a  a very polite way.”  board some flexibility depending on rea-  sonable facts, allowing them to enforce  forcement should be the responsibility   or delay enforcement from time to time,  of managers and staff. Board members   including the issuance of a warning rath-  er than a fine, for example.  “That said, it’s important never to  benefit of all residents. They may not   show or have favoritism in rule enforce-  ment,” he continues. “Residents are gen-  erally accepting when the enforcement of  mony. Boards must consider all options   a rule differs slightly based on facts, the  when seeking enforcement, but always   board wishing to seek an amicable solu-  tion, and similar items.”  Brooks also cautions against even the  in the best interest of the community.      appearance of discrimination. “There are   legal consequences for unequal enforce-  ment,” he warns. “If you don’t enforce   rules equally, and go to court, an owner   could have photos and evidence that they   were treated unfairly. It looks bad for a   board. A court will research the mat-  “It’s critical that fairness and equal-  forcement,” says Piekarsky. “Now, facing   special circumstances regarding COVID,   some case-by-case considerations should   one is challenged, but associations must   minority of residents are taking unfair   Who Should Do the Enforcing?  “The board enforces the rules,” says   of enforcement. However, if a resident is   not permitted the use of an amenity, for   staff member to remind the resident of   fer that staff members who are involved   Brooks further cautions that “tradi-  and/or management, and management   will then provide an enforcement letter.   It’s less personal than a board member   getting involved. With respect to the cur-  rent COVID crisis, this is very important.   not get involved in enforcement—and   ally depends on the situation as well. If   Piekarsky’s position is that rule en-  should never be involved.  Community rules are there for the   be  universally liked, but  they must  be   obeyed in the spirit of community har-  make sure that enforcement is within the   law and the community’s documents, and   n  A J Sidransky is a staff writer/reporter for   The New Jersey Cooperator, and a published   novelist.   LIVING BY THE RULES  continued from page 20


































































































   20   21   22   23   24